POL-302 Testimonials

“I thought the course’s basis on case law was fascinating and illustrated points perfectly.” -- Anonymous

“Very clear explanations of what needs to be in your NEPA documents and what does not, in order to have effective NEA docs.” -- Anonymous

“Great presenter on legal cases – work great for helping non-lawyers to better understand law issues (coming from an engineer)." -- Anonymous

“I like the decision/flowcharts, assumptions/outlines, advantages/disadvantage discussion and overview of the guidance. Make the 900 page guidance doc so much easier to digest and less painful to negotiate through.” -- Peter Kallaay

“Thorough well delivered presentation topics lended to staff being able to condut our own Phase I & 2 ESAs." -- Anonymous

"A very good mid-level review of the process of NEPA and FONSI process. Good interaction with students, good involvement of students. I'm excited to put the theory into practice!" -- Ryan Matthews

"[This course] gave me a completely new outlook on NEPA that is actually grounded on a strong legal foundation. I am much more prepared & knowledgable about how to construct NEPA documents. It is nothin short of a revolution in how I approach NEPA. Thank you! I will take this up with my NEPA colleagues. This is the first training in years that has kept my attention for the duration, I look forward to writing and reviewing EIS's!" -- Anonymous

“The instructor was very knowledgeable and passionate about the topic. He kept things interesting.” -- Anonymous

“The critiquing of real-life examples was incredibly helpful. Grounding the course in application rather than academia gives me confidence in undertaking topics covered in this course.” -- Anonymous

“This is the first NEPA course I’ve taken that focuses on important case law and, in so doing, actually creates a logical and legal framework from which you can actually write an EA/EOS! Hooray!” -- Anonymous