Whether you work for an agency of the Federal Government or the State of California or local agency in California, seek a permit, grant, or approval from one of these agencies, or are otherwise interested in government decision-making, you need to know about NEPA and CEQA. This workshop is designed to serve both as a comprehensive introduction for those new to these statutes and an update for more experienced professionals.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is perhaps the best-known of our Nation's environmental laws. It applies whenever federal agencies propose to take action or when they propose to fund or approve the actions of others, if environmental impacts are likely to result. NEPA opened federal agency decision-making to the public, and promotes decisions with more environmentally responsible values. The procedures and documents required by NEPA may at times form the only administrative record of federal decision-making.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) parallels NEPA for State and local agency actions. It is a system of environmental review that requires agencies considering project approval to take action to protect California's environment. It applies to any project requiring State or local agency action that may have a significant effect on the environment, whether on State, local agency, or private lands.
The success or failure of many actions in California will depend on compliance with NEPA and CEQA. Using models and case studies and a sample NEPA/CEQA document, this workshop will help you understand the procedural requirements of the NEPA/CEQA process, including how to determine when these processes apply, deciding which documents to prepare, determining the scope and content of NEPA/CEQA documents, preparing an adequate cumulative impacts analysis, and integration of NEPA and CEQA with other laws.
After completing this course, participants will be able to:
• Determine whether a NEPA / CEQA process is necessary
• Determine which process to follow: Categorical Exclusion, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact / Negative Declaration (or Mitigated Negative Declaration), or Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report
• Integrate NEPA and CEQA in a joint process
• Study, develop, and describe appropriate alternatives
• Complete an adequate cumulative impacts assessment
• Prepare an Administrative Record to support agency decisions
What Attendees are saying:
"Owen and Richard were very knlowledgeable about their respective expertise. Having both of their feedback on how to/how NOT to integrate was invaluable." Amanda D., May 2016
"Dialogue between instructors was an interesting way to reveal differences between CEQA and NEPA" Anonymous, May 2016
*Reduced tuition is available for Native American tribes, government employees, nonprofits, students and NAEP, NEBC, NWAEP members.
If you have any difficulties or questions regarding registration please call 425-270-3274 ext 103.
Please wait to receive a course confirmation email, roughly one month prior to the class, before making any travel arrangements.
The workshop is beneficial to agency staff and decision makers, attorneys, consultants, and members of environmental organizations, as well as interested citizens. Updates on recent cases will be valuable to any practitioner. Even those who have worked with NEPA and CEQA their entire careers will stand to learn more about the secrets to successful compliance.
Participants will receive substantial course materials prepared by Owen Schmidt and Richard Grassetti, which include models for compliance, interpretive case citations, and a sample NEPA/CEQA document.
Continuing Education Units: 1.30 CEUs
|Exemptions and exclusions|
All the reasons why an agency would not prepare any NEPA or CEQA document, or follow any NEPA or CEQA process.
Considerations in preparing adequate EAs and EISs
Eight plain-language questions any EA or EIS should readily answer.
Finding of No Significant Impact / Negative Declaration
How to make any "finding" required by law, specifically the Finding of No Significant Impact and/or Negative Declaration
Common problems and solutions in preparing adequate EIS's / EIR's
- Setting / Existing Conditions - the baseline or affected environment
- Impacts / Effects - environmental consequences and the methods of deriving them
- Mitigation Measures - mitigation incorporated into the alternatives, and mitigation as an alternative
|Timing the NEPA / CEQA process to the decision making process|
Understanding the essential markers of agency decision making, and matching them to the essential phases of the NEPA / CEQA process
Alternative places to go, alternative ways to get there
A model for conducting the "perfect" cumulative impacts analysis - everything necessary, and not one thing more
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
After decisions are made and actions are taken
What is required for support for the decisions that are made, and findings that are made.
About the Instructors
Owen L. Schmidt, BA, MA, JD, has more than 32 years of service with the Federal Government. He has served as Senior Counsel with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the General Counsel in Portland, Oregon, where he advised the Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and other USDA agencies in Washington and Oregon. He was also a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Oregon. Before joining USDA in 1991, he was an attorney for the Bonneville Power Administration, where he joined the legal staff after several years as an Environmental Specialist. Mr. Schmidt received his J.D. from Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College (1977), and a B.A. (1969) and M.A. (1973) in biology from St. Cloud State University, Minnesota. Mr. Schmidt is a frequent author and lecturer on the National Environmental Policy Act. He served as a Vice-Chair of the American Bar Association’s Book Publication Committee for the Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources and as a Vice President for the Ninth Circuit, The Federal Bar Association. He was the Editor of Oregon Birds, a quarterly journal of Oregon Field Ornithologists, for 14 years (1985-99), and is a long-time member of the Oregon Bird Records Committee.
Richard Grassetti is an environmental planner with over 32 years experience in environmental impact analysis and regulatory compliance. He is a recognized expert in the CEQA process, and has served as an expert witness on CEQA and planning issues in California. Through his firm, Grassetti Environmental Consulting (GECo), he manages the preparation of CEQA and NEPA documents, as well as the numerous local agency planning and permitting documents. In addition to his consulting practice, Mr. Grassetti serves as adjunct faculty in environmental studies at California State University, East Bay. He has presented numerous papers on environmental impact assessment at statewide and international conferences.
What to Bring
Please bring a pen or pencil, and notepad if you would like to take notes. You may also choose to take notes in your book. Lunch will be on your own, but drinks and snacks will be provided throughout the day.
In order to guarantee a space in a course, the tuition must be paid in full TWO WEEKS before the first day of the course by either check or credit card. State and government agencies paying with a purchase order are allowed payment under the two-week time frame if a copy of the purchase order is received by NWETC.
If You Need to Cancel
With 31 or more days notice, we will offer a 100% refund or credit towards a future course. The credit is good for one year and may be applied to any course.
- With 30-8 days notice, we will offer a course credit towards a future course. The credit is good for one year and may be applied to any course.
- With fewer than 8 days notice, there is no course credit available
*Please note that attendee replacement is welcome at any time
To request disability accommodations, please contact us at [email protected] or 425-270-3274 at least 30 days prior to the event.